The awesome of Google Voice 15 March 2010

So if you’ve never used Google Voice, it creates little transcripts of the voicemail people leave for you. Well, it tries. Sometimes it’s great, sometime it’s terrible, and sometimes it’s just terribly surreal. I get this call today, from some number I don’t recognize. The dude is speaking Spanish, and to my ears he sounds either inebriated, confused, or really tired. I don’t understand spoken Spanish very well, and I certainly don’t understand drunken rambling Spanish, and this call obviously isn’t intended for me. I’m not sure it’s intended for any man.

Anyway. Here is a MP3 of the actual call. Anything you Spanish-speaking / drunk-comprehending folks can decode, I’d be interested in hearing. BUT the true magic here is the incredibly awesome Google Voice transcript:

Out of the way. Yell way. How you doing and I’m trying to him. Hi Wells the My phone number listed. The where they don’t worry, inventing it’s in the car for the last Thursday. I left a lot of the more soon. I don’t know if that hey there. Hey, how are you. I’m really puller. But, Hello, this is. I’m gonna have to go you so soon, but it was to put it on. I’ve. I want to know. Wait til. So anyway, yo. Hello 2. So hope. Anyway, have a little bit. Pick a Roseville, Yes 2. Yes, Hello Susan, hoping to. Hey Jackie, natural that the Lane Suite, hey dad will pull up the phone, but it though knowing about a lawyer pass along number in that it was to want to know one of them and you of you blow your brother and I live in to open. Good luck in this date in this. deNigro Hello, I’m Kathleen, I will you know that it see you wed. But.

Right on, soldier.

Lessons in mortality 11 March 2010

Ah man, Willie Davis was found dead, aged 69. He took over centerfield for the LA Dodgers following the retirement of Duke Snider. The various death notices are especially sad as they paint a picture of a lonely man: he was found dead alone in his Burbank apartment by a “neighbor who sometimes bought him breakfast”; there is no available information concerning any survivors.

In 1996, Davis was arrested at his parents’ home for threatening to kill them and burn down the house unless they gave him $5,000. All of this while armed with samurai swords and throwing knives.

Sad.

In other news of the slow decline, Nomar Garciaparra retired the other day, signing a one-day contract to make his grand finale in a Boston uniform. He trotted onto their Spring Training field in Fort Meyers to a loud ovation to say good-bye to the fans who at times called for him to be traded, killed, or worse. The love-fest struck me me as a little awkward: there was so much (seeming) vitriol between he and the team in 2003 and 2004 that you might think they’d never speak again. Of course, it’s the fickle Boston media, who seem to relish a relationship with their stars at one extreme end of the emotional spectrum or the other (and throughout a career generally both) who we’re talking about, so how much of the drama was a cooked-up story we can’t be sure, but anyone who watched that team has well-seared into their memory the sulking Nomar in the dugout prior to the trade, and the sense of a weight lifted afterwards.

But the departure of Nomar is really and truly a bit melancholy for me because his emergence was followed by own reentry into being a fan of the game. I fell out of watching baseball in the early ’90s as it became at odds with my blossoming angsty teenage persona, missing the strike entirely (which was probably a good thing) and then, for whatever reason (perhaps the emergence of the web), started really watching right as our man was embarking on his 1997 Rookie of the Year campaign. He was incredible to watch: everything he did on the field felt effortless, and the change he seemed to represent at the shortstop position was genuinely an exciting development, though in hindsight perhaps a bit of a fad. Always a bit of a free-swinger (54% percentage of pitches swung at compared to the MLB average of 45%; 45% of first-pitch swings compared to the average of 26%), he was no textbook player, no lesson to the blossoming players of the world, but man was he fun to watch. From the rituals prior to pretty much every single pitch to the home run blasts, he was among the best shortstops in the league from 1999 through 2000, suffering then a wrist injury that seems to have really diminished his skills. He rose once more, briefly, to bang 20 deep flies in 2004 for the Dodgers, earning himself one final All Star appearance.

All time he ranks honorably, his Wins Above Replacement number at 42.6, 30th all-time among shortstops, right behind Omar Vizquel (43.2) and right ahead of Phil Ruzzuto (41.8). Though that latter player is in the Hall of Fame, and the former most certainly will be, I don’t think Nomar’s name really belongs in the discussion, even as a long-shot. He burned brilliantly, but for too short a time. It is sad to see him go- and puzzling to see him join forces with the antagonistic media- but I am quite happy to have seen him play.

As I write this, Pedro Martinez, another towering figurehead from the Nomar-era Sox, is still without a job. Should he fail to catch on it will be sad to see two of the most exciting players I’ve ever watched go into retirement. It certainly makes a fella feel old.

But, hey, that’s life. It’s springtime again, it’s full of new faces, new beginnings, and a new story.

Pascarelli removed from Baseball Today 5 March 2010

ESPN shall apparently brook no criticisms of Bud Selig. The host of their Baseball Today podcast, Peter Pascarelli, was summarily wiped from history after offering a nauseating and forced apology for saying of the recently erected Bud Selig statue outside Milwaukee’s Miller Park that it could be improved by the efforts of Wisconsin’s pigeons.

If you catch his meaning.

Anyway, it’s all reminiscent of the time ESPN also forced “news” anchor Scott Van Pelt to apologize to Mr. Selig for questioning the value in his $18m salary. The network’s not really fond of any kind of criticism that might jeopardize their relationship with MLB.

The network even went so far as to remove the comments from the podcast. The show resumed with no sign of Pascarelli, nor any mention of his fate from the hosts.

VANQUISHED!

Inaugural MILTON BRADLEY WATCH post 4 March 2010

Seriously, I thought I might have to wait until at least the regular season to kick this little series off, but the baseball gods give and the baseball gods giveth again. Ever since my favorite club decided to trade for Milton Bradley (not a bad trade, really, as it allowed them to flush the contract and BMI of Carlos Silva), I figured I would keep watch and follow his routine blow-ups throughout the season. I expect the Ms to do well and to be competitive in their West, but even if they fall on their collective face, well, there will always be the Milton Bradley Watch.

Bradley was interviewed by the New York Times – who were no doubt simply angling to antagonize the misunderstood outfielder and cajole him into a money quote or two – and asked about his troubles during his Cubs stint. Did Milton try to simply move on and allow the water under the bridge by letting bygones to be just that? Why no, he did not:

Two years ago, I played, and I was good. I go to Chicago, not good. I’ve been good my whole career. So, obviously, it was something with Chicago, not me.

Yes! The man’s been good his whole career. For the one year where he was not good, it was “something” with the city. “Something” with the fans, Wrigley, Lou Pinella, the traffic- whatever. Bradley claims the Cubs expected him to be a 30 HR guy despite never hitting more than 20 before his 2008 stint with Texas. Chicago manager Lou Pinella disagreed with the assessment.

Ah, Milton. It’s only March 4. The Ms have yet to play their second game of Spring Training. Already, the quotes are rolling in. It’s certainly some kind of divine intervention that the Mariners play the Cubs this year in interleague play; if only the game were at Wrigley.

Visualization of college football program interaction 3 March 2010

Brian Fremeau presents a solid visualization of the interaction among AP top-ranked college football programs in 1989 and in 2009, showing clearly that the elite programs don’t play each other as much as they used to. It would be interesting to see it broken down by year to see if it’s an out and out decline over time or if there haveĀ  been peaks and valleys. Fremeau argues that conference expansion is the likely the reason, noting that in 1989, 25 FBS teams were independent, whereas in 2009 only 3 programs remained so, none of which were ranked by the AP.

Not much of a college football guy myself- maybe ‘cos the ole alma mater had no program- but it’s always awesome to see complex data represented in a simple, intuitive manner. Props to Fremeau.